Recent Publications from the Norwich Society

Chapelfield gardensAs with so many other treasures, Norwich doesn’t realise or value what it has.  The Norwich Society’s 2008 Environmental Audit has highlighted the fact that Norwich has one of the largest and best collections of civic public parks in the country but they are under used. There are so many facilities for sports and games of all kinds: should the City Council do more to encourage people to use the parks?

  • Almost without exception our audit found the maintenance of the parks was excellent; great credit must go to the City Care team who carry out this task. Surely some of our parks would qualify for the Green Flag Award for Parks.
  • There were a few areas of concern.  In 2005 this committee drew attention to the disgraceful state of the Castle Mound, and below the Mound, the unacceptably neglected Castle Gardens.  This is an historic site in the centre of the City and a key tourist area.  Remedial action has been agreed but has yet to begin.
  • The other park which we felt fell below standard was Mile Cross. A local ‘Friends’ group is doing great work against difficult odds and would like to see it restored to the standard of the other historic parks.
  • There are attendants in some of the parks some of the time but vandalism remains a problem.  It would seem that the presence of authority and involvement of the local community does make a big difference to the way the park is treated.
  • There is a lack of signage to direct to some of the more suburban parks which were often difficult to find. Toilets were just about adequate though those at Mousehold were in a poor state.
  • The restored pavilion at Waterloo Park was shuttered and apparently had little if any use.
For full report click here....
Norwich City Council is seeking views on proposed changes to its current system of imposing planning obligations on developers in the form of contributions under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. These changes are being sought in response to both local and national lobbying by the building industry and developers to the effect that the current economic climate makes such contributions too onerous, and can lead to delay or cancellation of projects.

Section 106 contributions are used to pay for improvements to the social infrastructure, surrounding new buildings and developments. These can include paying for an agreed percentage of affordable housing within a development, new roads, schools, health facilities and other benefits to the public realm. Many councils, unlike Norwich, choose as an act of policy to extend the use of Section 106 to make developers use a very small portion (usually less than 1%) of construction costs to pay for public art.

The Norwich Society is strongly in favour of the constructive use of Section 106 to improve as much of the City’s social infrastructure as possible. But the City Council’s consultation also enables us to comment on what we consider to be a major omission in the Planning Department’s standard list of possible requirements – that of Public Art. Norwich is failing to use a planning tool which could mightily enhance our cityscape, making it more attractive to citizens, tourists and outside investors drawn by the quality of life in our community. Read full response here

They sit and read on it; eat their hamburgers on it; meet their friends and chat on it; let their children climb and play on it; some just sit and watch, others contemplate its meaning. Certainly to judge from its use, Norwich’s latest piece of public art, Anne and Patrick Poirier’s assemblage of forms on Hay Hill is a resounding success: sculpture that is useful, good to touch and to look at and also intrigues. This new work is directly allied to the statue of Sir Thomas Browne, but this, with Barbara Hepworth’s Sea Form in the Castle gardens, is one of the few sculptures in the city in a public place. The Norwich Society’s recent publication ‘Public Sculpture in central Norwich’ highlights the diversity of sculpture in the city in form and period. But it also highlights the paucity of sculpture as a whole, in particular sited in key public places. Where it does exist it is often part of the decoration of a building, (e.g. the City Hall lions, Prospect House ‘Untitled’ by Bernard Meadows). While these are excellent and contribute to the street scene, the numbers of free standing public works are few.

Read or Download the full report as a printable document

The Environment Committee’s Audit for 2007 has broken with the Society’s tradition of looking at geographical areas of the City and instead taken on a single issue: the preservation of historic views. Many such views are being lost by planting, planning and building decisions which take no account of them.

This report is not just about the classic views from outside – the traditional prospects - but also about the vistas along our streets, and the rooflines that define our horizons.
The glimpses we catch of historic buildings as we walk through the City are necessary for our continuing appreciation of our heritage: a good view can raise the spirit, emphasize landmarks, and identify location.  Clutter and careless development can destroy our whole perception of a place.
The report looks at the best and the worst from 2007.

Read or Download the full report as a printable document

 

This new report emphasizes what an important but understated asset the river is for Norwich – a river sequence that is emerging now from a fundamental change in patterns of use. This is expressed most vividly in rebuilding over the last decade and in developments now in progress.

Full report on the web   

Download a PDF version

The Norwich Society, The Assembly House, Norwich NR2 1RQ | Tel (01603) 765606 | Email enquiries@thenorwichsociety.co.uk
Copyright © The Norwich Society 2007 | Photograph Copyrights via the Norwich Society